Answer:
A). A few of the positive particles aimed at a gold foil seemed to bounce back off of the thin metallic foil.
Explanation:
Scientists decided to change the model of the atom when they discovered new evidence that showed 'few of the positive particles aimed at a gold foil seemed to bounce back off of the thin metallic foil.' On this ground, <u>Rutherford concluded that atom is mostly made up of empty space and thus, he proposed a nucleus model of atom in which the atom comprises of the tiny and positively charged nucleus is surrounded by electrons with a negative charge</u>. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
a)η = 69.18 %
b)W= 1210 J
c)P=3967.21 W
Explanation:
Given that
Q₁ = 1749 J
Q₂ = 539 J
From first law of thermodynamics
Q₁ = Q₂ +W
W=Work out put
Q₂=Heat rejected to the cold reservoir
Q₁ =heat absorb by hot reservoir
W= Q₁- Q₂
W= 1210 J
The efficiency given as
η = 69.18 %
We know that rate of work done is known as power
P=3967.21 W
Answer:
≅3666.67 N
Explanation:
Use Newton's 2nd law, F = ma where F=force applied, m = mass of the object,
a = acceleration acquired by the object.
a= (v-u)/t where v = final velocity, u = initial velocity and t = time taken
calculate a = (30-0)/9 ≅ 3.33 m/s2
Then F = 1100×a = 3666.67 N
<span>U could compare them using the intensity
technique when bending waves are negligible in comparison with
quasi-longitudinal waves.</span>
