All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is an example of a concentric contraction

Chemistry

2 answers:

ladessa [460]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

B: bicep curl

Explanation:

In a bicep curl the muscle in the biceps contracts or shortens creating a tension on the muscle. During concentric contraction a lot of force is generated that allows the movement of an object such as a dumbbell. As the dumbbell is moved to the shoulder the bicep bulges or contracts. Concentric contraction is used for muscular hypertrophy.

anastassius [24]3 years ago

3 0

The best and the correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice or letter B.

A bicep curl is a<span>n example of a concentric contraction.

</span>I hope my answer has come to your help. Have a nice day ahead and may God bless you always!

You might be interested in

How much potassium chloride is needed to make 0.500 m solution with 1.50 L of water?

Andrew [12]

Answer:

55.9 g KCl.

Explanation:

Hello there!

In this case, according to the definition of molality for the 0.500-molar solution, we need to divide the moles of solute (potassium chloride) over the kilograms of solvent as shown below:

$m=\frac{mol}{kilograms}$

Thus, solving for the moles of solute, we obtain:

$mol=m*kilograms$

Since the density of water is 1 kg/L, we obtain the following moles:

$mol=0.500mol/kg*1.50kg\\\\mol=0.75mol$

Next, since the molar mass of KCl is 74.5513 g/mol, the mass would be:

$0.75mol*\frac{74.5513g}{1mol}\\\\55.9g \ KCl$

Regards!

4 0

3 years ago

Which diagram illustrates that matter is always conserved during a chemical reaction?

Alika [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During a volcanic eruption, large amounts of poisonous gases and particles are released into the atmosphere. How do some of thes

xz_007 [3.2K]

A through rain because it is:)

3 0

2 years ago

Relate what you have learned about the word quantum to the Bohr model.

ss7ja [257]

I forgot what quantum means to be honest, the Bohr model In atomic physics, the Bohr model or Rutherford–Bohr model, presented by Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford in 1913, is a system consisting of a small, dense nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons—similar to the structure of the Solar System, but with attraction provided by electrostatic forces in place of gravity. After the cubical model (1902), the plum pudding model (1904), the Saturnian model (1904), and the Rutherford model (1911) came the Rutherford–Bohr model or just Bohr model for short (1913). The improvement over the 1911 Rutherford model mainly concerned the new quantum physical interpretation.

7 0

2 years ago

A 0.4647-g sample of a compound known to contain only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen was burned in oxygen to yield 0.01962 mol of

Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

See explanation.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, we can show how the empirical formula is found by following the shown below procedure:

1. Compute the moles of carbon in carbon dioxide as the only source of carbon at the products:

$n_C=0.01962molCO_2*\frac{1molC}{1molCO_2} =0.01962molC$

2. Compute the moles of hydrogen in water as the only source of hydrogen at the products:

$n_H=0.01961molH_2O*\frac{2molH}{1molH_2O}=0.03922molH$

3. Compute the mass of oxygen by subtracting the mass of both carbon and hydrogen from the 0.4647-g sample:

$m_O=0.4647g-0.01962molC*\frac{12gC}{1molC}-0.03922molH*\frac{1gH}{1molH} =0.1900gO$

4. Compute the moles of oxygen by using its molar mass:

$n_O=0.1900gO*\frac{1molO}{16gO}=0.01188molO$

5. Divide the moles of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen by the moles of oxygen (smallest one) to find the subscripts in the empirical formula:

$C=\frac{0.01962}{0.01188}=1.65\\ \\H=\frac{0.03922}{0.01188} =3.3\\\\O=\frac{0.01188}{0.01188} =1$

6. Search for the closest whole number (in this case multiply by 2):

$C_3H_6O_2$

Moreover, the empirical formula suggests this compound could be carboxylic acid since it has two oxygen atoms, nevertheless, this is not true since the molar mass is 222.27 g/mol, therefore, we should compute the molar mass of the empirical formula, that is:

$M=12*3+1*6+16*2=74g/mol$

Which is about three times in the molecular formula, for that reason, the actual formula is:

$C_9H_{18}O_6$

It suggest that the compound has a highly oxidizing character due to the presence of oxygen, therefore, we cannot predict the distribution of the functional groups as it could contain, carboxyl, carbonyl, hydroxyl or even peroxi.

Best regards.

6 0

2 years ago