I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:

Explanation:
As we know that tension force in the string will be equal to the centripetal force on the string
so we will have

now we have

now we have


now when string length is 0.896 m and its speed is 71.5 m/s then we will have



By definition, the speed of an object is given by:

Where,
dr/dt: derived from the position with respect to time
Therefore, speed has units of length over units of time.
Thus, speed is a derived quantity, since it depends on the value of two other quantities.
Answer:
a derived quantity is:
C. Speed
Answer:
29.412m/s
Explanation:
where F= force, m= mass, and a=acceleration
we also know that,
a = Δv / t where Δv = change in velocity and t = time
thus F = m ( Δv / t)

Δv
29.412m/s=Δv