You sketch a water molecule and show a partial positive charge on the two Hydrogen atoms and a partial negative charge on the oxygen atom.
Answer:
θ_c = 36.87°
Explanation:
Index of refraction for index medium; n_i = 2
Index of refraction for Refractive medium; n_r = 1.2
Formula to find the critical angle is given;
n_i(sin θ_c) = n_r(sin 90)
Where θ_c is critical angle.
Thus;
2 × (sin θ_c) = 1.2 × 1
(sin θ_c) = 1.2/2
(sin θ_c) = 0.6
θ_c = sin^(-1) 0.6
θ_c = 36.87°
The questions from this lot which could be tested in a scientific manner would be "what causes some people to be color-blind"
and
"what are the best shoes to wear when exercising"
Both of these questions can be tested in a scientific way through an experiment.
Answer:
0.82 MPa
Explanation:
the change in pressure 'σ'=160kPa
K= σ/∈
=> σ/3∈
K= 160/(3 x 0.065)
K=820 kPA=0.82 MPa
Thus,the bulk modulus of the tissue 'K' is 0.82 MPa
Answer:
The correct answer is a) The kinetic energy of the ice increases by equal amounts for equal distances.
Explanation:
The law of conservation states that the energy cannot be created nor be destroyed but can be converted from one form to another.Before the ice even starts falling we already know that it possesses energy in the form of potential energy given by P=mgh where m is the mass of the ice , g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the ice above the ground whatever that may be, since a number is not given here.As the ice falls the energy is converted from potential energy to kinetic energy. We notice one thing about the equation for the potential energy P , which is that it is not only directly proportional to h but also is linear in h as well(which is the main reason why a) is correct) which means that if the ice drops by 1 meter the potential energy it will have lost would be ΔPE=mgΔh=-mg, where Δh is the change in its height which is 1 meter here.And according to the principle of conservation of energy this energy must be converted to kinetic energy so the ΔKE=-ΔPE=mg, and this process repeats and for each meter it falls, it picks up the same amount of kinetic energy equaling mg(which is the same as the loss in PE per each meter of fall). So a 2 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 2mg, a 3 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 3mg. gain in kinetic energy only depends on the drop in height, which is true irrespective of where the ice might happen to be in its journey close to the top or the bottom. So the drop in height of lets say x at any point in the journey will result in the same increase in KE = ΔKE = mgx. Which proves part a) to be correct.
