1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leviafan [203]
3 years ago
14

What differentiates the master builder approach prior to the Renaissance from later approaches? Projects do not depend on indivi

dual knowledge but leverage the total knowledge of the team. The engineering and construction roles dominated projects because architectural designs were so simple. The architect and engineer roles are clearly separated into separate project phases. Knowledge is confined to particular individuals and not shared or formalized into a recognizable set of standards.
Engineering
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Design-Build, though not new as a delivery method for building projects, appears to be on the rise. Traditionally known as the Master-Builder method, it is a means of building where one party holds responsibility for both the design and the construction. The Master-Builder method was the only method before the now ubiquitous design-bid-build project structure. The Romans for example, famous for their roads, aqueducts, and amphitheaters, did not design a project, bid it out to subcontractors, and then select the low bidder to build it, but rather designed and built structures in a collaborative, somewhat simultaneous fashion. In building a house for a client during Colonial times, one party, such as a master carpenter, was responsible for delivering the general layout and exterior details, selecting structural members, and completing construction. In this way, the carpenter acted as the architect, engineer, and builder simultaneously. The concept of design, bid, and build arose out of the natural specialization of the architect, engineer, and builder in the post-1850s world, where modern structural engineering was born and separated from architecture, and architects and builders fully separated as distinct and separate entities.

Explanation:

google

You might be interested in
How do scientists and engineers use math to help them?
VikaD [51]
Math (e.g., algebra, geometry, calculus, computer computation) is used both as a tool to create mathematical models that describe physical phenomena and as a tool to evaluate the merit of different possible solutions. ... In engineering, math and science are tools used within the engineering design process.
Biologists use math as they plot graphs to help them understand equations, run small “trial and error” tests with some sample numbers when developing algorithms, and use the R project for analyzing protein sequences and structures. Electrical engineers use math in many ways in their career. They use math to help design and test electrical equipment. They use math to calculate amp and volt requirements for electrical projects. They use math in creating computer simulations and designs for new products.
7 0
3 years ago
The denominator of a fraction is 4 more than the numenator. If 4 is added to the numenator and 7 is added to the denominator, th
kati45 [8]

Answer:

\frac{3}{7}

Explanation:

Lets take the numerator of the fraction to be = x

So the denominator of the fraction is 4 more than the numerator = x+4

The fraction is ;\frac{x}{4+x}

Now add 4 to the numerator and add 7 to the denominator as;

\frac{x+4}{4+x+7} =\frac{x+4}{x+11}

This new fraction is equal to 1 half =1/2

write the equation as;

\frac{x+4}{x+11} =\frac{1}{2}

perform cross-product

2(x+4 )=1( x+11 )

2x+8 = x + 11

2x-x = 11-8

x=3

The original fraction is;  

\frac{x}{4+x} =\frac{3}{3+4} =\frac{3}{7}

3 0
3 years ago
What is electromagnetic induction?
Over [174]
The process of using magnetic fields to produce voltage.
6 0
3 years ago
ممكن الحل ............
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

i dont understand

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Three tool materials (high-speed steel, cemented carbide, and ceramic) are to be compared for the same turning operation on a ba
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Among all three tools, the ceramic tool is taking the least time for the production of a batch, however, machining from the HSS tool is taking the highest time.

Explanation:

The optimum cutting speed for the minimum cost

V_{opt}= \frac{C}{\left[\left(T_c+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]^n}\;\cdots(i)

Where,

C,n = Taylor equation parameters

T_h =Tool changing time in minutes

C_e=Cost per grinding per edge

C_m= Machine and operator cost per minute

On comparing with the Taylor equation VT^n=C,

Tool life,

T= \left[ \left(T_t+\frac{C_e}{C_m}\right)\left(\frac{1}{n}-1\right)\right]}\;\cdots(ii)

Given that,  

Cost of operator and machine time=\$40/hr=\$0.667/min

Batch setting time = 2 hr

Part handling time: T_h=2.5 min

Part diameter: D=73 mm =73\times 10^{-3} m

Part length: l=250 mm=250\times 10^{-3} m

Feed: f=0.30 mm/rev= 0.3\times 10^{-3} m/rev

Depth of cut: d=3.5 mm

For the HSS tool:

Tool cost is $20 and it can be ground and reground 15 times and the grinding= $2/grind.

So, C_e= \$20/15+2=\$3.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=3 min.

C= 80 m/min

n=0.130

(a) From equation (i), cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {80}{\left[ \left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]^{0.13}}

\Rightarrow 47.7 m/min

(b) From equation (ii), the tool life,

T=\left(3+\frac{3.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.13}-1\right)\right]}

\Rightarrow T=53.4 min

(c) Cycle time: T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

where,

T_m= Machining time for one part

n_p= Number of pieces cut in one tool life

T_m= \frac{l}{fN} min, where N=\frac{V_{opt}}{\pi D} is the rpm of the spindle.

\Rightarrow T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 47.7}=4.01 min/pc

So, the number of parts produced in one tool life

n_p=\frac {T}{T_m}

\Rightarrow n_p=\frac {53.4}{4.01}=13.3

Round it to the lower integer

\Rightarrow n_p=13

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+4.01+\frac{3}{13}=6.74 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times6.74+\frac{3.33}{13}=\$4.75/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch= Sum of setup time and production time for one batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 6.74}{50}=457 min=7.62 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times4.01}{457}=0.4387=43.87\%

Now, for the cemented carbide tool:

Cost per edge,

C_e= \$8/6=\$1.33/edge

Tool changing time, T_t=1min

C= 650 m/min

n=0.30

(a) Cutting speed for the minimum cost:

V_{opt}= \frac {650}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]^{0.3}}=363m/min [from(i)]

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.33}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.3}-1\right)\right]=7min [from(ii)]

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

T_m= \frac{\pi D l}{fV_{opt}}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 363}=0.53min/pc

n_p=\frac {7}{0.53}=13.2

\Rightarrow n_p=13 [ nearest lower integer]

So, the cycle time

T_c=2.5+0.53+\frac{1}{13}=3.11 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times3.11+\frac{1.33}{13}=\$2.18/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch=2\times60+ {50\times 3.11}{50}=275.5 min=4.59 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.53}{275.5}=0.0962=9.62\%

Similarly, for the ceramic tool:

C_e= \$10/6=\$1.67/edge

T_t-1min

C= 3500 m/min

n=0.6

(a) Cutting speed:

V_{opt}= \frac {3500}{\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]^{0.6}}

\Rightarrow V_{opt}=2105 m/min

(b) Tool life,

T=\left[ \left(1+\frac{1.67}{0.667}\right)\left(\frac{1}{0.6}-1\right)\right]=2.33 min

(c) Cycle time:

T_c=T_h+T_m+\frac{T_t}{n_p}

\Rightarrow T_m=\frac{\pi \times 73 \times 250\times 10^{-6}}{0.3\times 10^{-3}\times 2105}=0.091 min/pc

n_p=\frac {2.33}{0.091}=25.6

\Rightarrow n_p=25 pc/tool\; life

So,

T_c=2.5+0.091+\frac{1}{25}=2.63 min/pc

(d) Cost per production unit:

C_c= C_mT_c+\frac{C_e}{n_p}

\Rightarrow C_c=0.667\times2.63+\frac{1.67}{25}=$1.82/pc

(e) Total time to complete the batch

=2\times60+ {50\times 2.63}=251.5 min=4.19 hr.

(f) The proportion of time spent actually cutting metal

=\frac{50\times0.091}{251.5}=0.0181=1.81\%

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the thickness of the material that will allow heat transfer of 6706.8 *10^6 kcal during the 5 months through the rectangle
    8·1 answer
  • g A plane stress element has components sigma x = 160 MPa, tau xy = 100 MPa (CW). Determine the two values pf sigma y for which
    13·1 answer
  • (3) In the following power system, the transformer is assumed to be ideal. Determine the: a) currents and voltages across each i
    9·1 answer
  • A stream of air enters a 7.00-cm ID pipe at a velocity of 30.0 m/s at 27.0°C and 1.80 bar (gauge). At a point downstrream, the a
    15·1 answer
  • What is your employer required to have on fixed ladders that extend more than 24 feet in the workplace?
    15·2 answers
  • Opposition to current flow, restricts or resists current flow
    15·1 answer
  • Q1. Basic calculation of the First law (2’) (a) Suppose that 150 kJ of work are used to compress a spring, and that 25 kJ of hea
    6·1 answer
  • A beam of span L meters simply supported by the ends, carries a central load W. The beam section is shown in figure. If the maxi
    5·1 answer
  • In the situation shown below, what would the Moon look like from Earth? Sun, Earth and Moon Four Moon Views A. View A B. View B
    8·1 answer
  • Why is psychology considered a science
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!