Answer:
v = 5.24[m/s]
Explanation:
Este problema se puede resolver por medio del principio de la conservación de la energía, donde la energía potencial es igual a la energía cinética. Es decir a medida que el carrito desciende su energía potencial disminuye, pero su energía cinética aumenta.
Donde:
Ahora reemplazando:
![\frac{1}{2} *m*v^{2}=m*g*h\\\\0.5*v^{2}=9.81*1.4\\v=\sqrt{\frac{9.81*1.4}{0.5} } \\\\v=5.24[m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%2Am%2Av%5E%7B2%7D%3Dm%2Ag%2Ah%5C%5C%5C%5C0.5%2Av%5E%7B2%7D%3D9.81%2A1.4%5C%5Cv%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B9.81%2A1.4%7D%7B0.5%7D%20%7D%20%20%20%5C%5C%5C%5Cv%3D5.24%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
I would say that insofar as the two stars temperatures are presumably closely related to their luminosity, that the blue star at 156,100 k compared to 3000k for the red star then the blue star has a luminosity of 52 times that of the red star.
<span>A: put an atom on a poster in the exhibit
Good luck. The poster itself is made of trillions of trillions of trillions
of atoms. You could not see the extra one any easier than you could
see the ones that are already there, and even if you could, it would be
lost in the crowd.
B: use a life size drawing of an atom
Good luck. Nobody has ever seen an atom. Atoms are too small
to see. That's a big part of the reason that nobody knew they exist
until less than 200 years ago.
D: set up a microscope so that visitors can view atoms
Good luck. Atoms are way too small to see with a microscope.
</span><span><span>C: Display a large three dimensional model of an atom.
</span> </span>Finally ! A suggestion that makes sense.
If something is too big or too small to see, show a model of it
that's just the right size to see.
