Answer:
what's that all about
hehehwhe
Explanation:
dgbjjjedgkigdssfhkkoyddwrhkoyeqaxghjjhasghffhjiopjtewqetujjgda
A. The cliff was 30.7 m high
B. I also got 9.5 as the horizontal distance
Here is my work, I find making charts like this one to find knowns and unknowns can be helpful
C is probably the correct one
Because it's literally impossible to tell exactly where something that size is
located at any particular time.
And that's NOT because it's so small that we can't see it. It's because any
material object behaves as if it's made of waves, and the smaller the object is,
the more the size of its waves get to be like the same size as the object.
When you get down to things the size of subatomic particles, it doesn't make
sense any more to try and talk about where the particle actually "is", and we only
talk about the waves that define it, and how the waves all combine to become a
cloud of <em><u>probability</u></em> of where the particle is.
I know it sounds weird. But that's the way it is. Sorry.
Answer:
I dont know spanish... and i live in Cali... wow....
Explanation:
