I think the answer is A because it’s a better explanation
Answer:
Either Answer you Put is fine i put one as an answer and the other is the sample response and got it right.
My Answer: rather than typical sea floor rock, which had been shocked, melted, and ejected to the surface in minutes, and evidence of colossal seawater movement directly afterwards from sand deposits. Crucially the cores also showed a near complete absence of gypsum, a sulfate-containing rock, which would have been vaporized and dispersed as an aerosol into the atmosphere, confirming the presence of a probable link between the impact and global longer-term effects on the climate and food chain.
Sample Response:
Samples from the Western Hemisphere contained significantly higher amounts of shock-fractured quartz. This led Walter and Luis Alvarez to hypothesize that the asteroid impact site was in the Western Hemisphere.
Explanation:
The answer is:
It is a measure of the strength of the bonds between ions.
Lattice energy is an estimate of the strength of the bonds formed by ionic compounds.
The first two choices are wrong because it is actually the opposite.
- As the ion size increases, lattice energy <u>decreases</u>.
- As charge of ions increases, lattice energy <u>increases</u>
As for the other third option, it is wrong because lattice energy is the energy RELEASED not absorbed.
