Answer:
The minimum thickness of the soap bubble for destructive interference to occur is 225.56 nm.
Explanation:
Given;
wavelength of light, λ = 600 nm
The minimum thickness of the soap bubble for destructive interference to occur is given by;

where;
n is refractive index of soap film = 1.33

Therefore, the minimum thickness of the soap bubble for destructive interference to occur is 225.56 nm.
The expression of the electric flux is

Here,
Q = Total charge enclosed in the closed surface
= Permittivity due to free space
Rearranging to find the charge,

Replacing with our values we have finally



The charge enclosed by the box is 0.1684nC
The sign of the charge can be decided by using the direction of the flux. The charge enclosed by the cube can be calculated by using the electric flux and the permitivity of free space.
1. I think it's the trails left by an electron as it moves around the nucleus.
2. The atomic number is the number of protons so it is 8.
3. It's mass is lowered but it is still the same element.
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is 2.26 millivolts
<h3>Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor</h3>
The capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor is given by C = ε₀A/d where
- ε₀ = permittivity of free space = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m,
- A = area of plates and
- d = distance between plates = 4.0 mm = 4.0 × 10⁻³ m.
<h3>Charge on plates</h3>
Also, the surface charge on the capacitor Q = σA where
- σ = charge density = 5.0 pC/m² = 5.0 × 10⁻¹² C/m² and
- a = area of plates.
<h3>
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor</h3>
The potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is V = Q/C
= σA ÷ ε₀A/d
= σd/ε₀
Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have
V = σd/ε₀
V = 5.0 × 10⁻¹² C/m² × 4.0 × 10⁻³ m/8.854 × 10⁻¹² F/m
V = 20.0 C/m × 10⁻³/8.854 F/m
V = 2.26 × 10⁻³ Volts
V = 2.26 millivolts
So, the potential difference across the parallel plate capacitor is 2.26 millivolts
Learn more about potential difference across parallel plate capacitor here:
brainly.com/question/12993474
Answer:
What material structure explanation lies behind the fact that the propagation velocity of longitudinal waves is the lowest in gases and the highest in solids?