The formula of net Force is:F = mawhere m is the mass of the objecta is the acceleration of the object
thus, if we triple the net force applied to the object:
3F = maa = 3F / m
The acceleration is also tripled since the force is directly proportional to the acceleration.
Answer:
The change in length is 0.01056 m.
Explanation:
Given that,
Length = 11 m
Temperature = 20°C
Pressure = 1 atm
Boiling temperature = 100°C
We need to calculate the length
Using formula of change in linear expansion
Put the value into the formula
Hence, The change in length is 0.01056 m.
Answer:
The total amount of CO₂ produced will be = 20680 kg/year
The reduction in the amount of CO₂ emissions by that household per year = 3102 kg/year
Explanation:
Given:
Power used by household = 14000 kWh
Fuel oil used = 3400 L
CO₂ produced of fuel oil = 3.2 kg/L
CO₂ produced of electricity = 0.70 kg/kWh
Now, the total amount of CO₂ produced will be = (14000 kWh × 0.70 kg/kWh) + (3400 L × 3.2 kg/L)
⇒ The total amount of CO₂ produced will be = 9800 + 10880 = 20680 kg/year
Now,
if the usage of electricity and fuel oil is reduced by 15%, the reduction in the amount of the CO₂ emission will be = 0.15 × 20680 kg/year = 3102 kg/year
In the circuit, the total current is 60 A and the voltage is 240 V. If R1
resistance is 20 Ω, then the R2 resistance would be 5 Ω
<h3>What is resistance?</h3>
Resistance is the obstruction of electrons in an electrically conducting material. The SI unit of the resistance is Ohm
The mathematical relation for resistance can be understood with the help of the empirical relation provided by Ohm's law.
V=IR
where V is the voltage
I is the current
R is the resistance
For the given problem V= 240 V and I = 60 A
R = V/I
R =240/60
R =4 Ω
For calculating equivalent resistance in parallel combination.
1/Re = 1/R1 + 1/R2
1/4 = 1/20 + 1/R2
R2 = 5 Ω
Thus , the R2 resistance would be 5 Ω, therefore the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about resistance here
brainly.com/question/14547003
#SPJ1
Answer:
C)a lack of supporting empirical evidence
Explanation:
A scientific reasoning can be rendered invalid if empirical evidences are lacking. Empirical evidences are usually a product of observations or experiments.
When these are lacking or cannot be gathered, scientific observations or sometimes reasoning can be rendered as invalid because there is no ground to prove them.
